Creditor rights and bank capital decisions: Conventional vs. Islamic banking - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Corporate Finance Année : 2019

Creditor rights and bank capital decisions: Conventional vs. Islamic banking

(1) , (2)
1
2
Mohammad Bitar
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1028319

Résumé

Using a sample of banks operating in 24 countries, we provide robust evidence that stronger creditor rights are associated with higher capital adequacy ratios of conventional banks but not of Islamic banks. Such results are more effective on bank core capital, suggesting that bank managers tend to increase pure equity to signal better monitoring efforts and avoid losing control in an environment characterized by strong creditor protection. Except in less religious countries with less competitive markets, Islamic banks appear to be less affected by creditor protection possibly because of the profit loss sharing (PLS) principle that considers depositors as investors who agree to share profits and losses with the bank, thus making the effect of creditor protection weaker or irrelevant in an Islamic banking context.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-01943162 , version 1 (03-12-2018)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01943162 , version 1

Citer

Mohammad Bitar, Amine Tarazi. Creditor rights and bank capital decisions: Conventional vs. Islamic banking. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2019, 55, pp.69-104. ⟨hal-01943162⟩

Collections

UNILIM
23 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More