Comparison of four methods to assess biofilm development - Université de Limoges Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Water Science and Technology Année : 2011

Comparison of four methods to assess biofilm development

Résumé

Two nondestructive methods of biofilm quantification (optical density via a flatbed scanner and biofilm thickness) have been evaluated and compared to two destructive methods (Crystal Violet staining after biofilm disintegration and dry weight). The methods were tested on biofilms that developed on a modified rotating biological contactor (RBC) that was inoculated with urban wastewater and fed with a synthetic medium that mimicked slaughterhouse wastewater. The results of the different methods were highly correlated (coefficient of correlation greater than 0.8). This validation experiment confirms the ability of the scanning method to easily monitor the biofilm's development over large surfaces without destruction of the biofilm.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-00798376 , version 1 (08-03-2013)

Identifiants

Citer

Muatasem Alnnasouri, Christophe Dagot, Marie-Noëlle Pons. Comparison of four methods to assess biofilm development. Water Science and Technology, 2011, 63 (3), pp.432-439. ⟨10.2166/wst.2011.239⟩. ⟨hal-00798376⟩
82 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More